New data from the FTTH Council Europe points to promising trends for fibre deployment, but a closer look at the figures suggest demand is not quite as high as some would imagine.
As somewhat of a disclaimer, immediate sales are not necessarily required, fibre-optic broadband infrastructure is not going out of date anytime soon, though return-on-investment (ROI) is a major element factored into CAPEX decisions. As long as the services are sold over the next 30-40 years, ROI can be realised, however the telcos are impatient, short on cash and being asked to spend an eye-watering amount everywhere (fibre deployments and 5G); the sooner the better for ROI.
The table below might seem confusing, but it demonstrates that telcos haven’t quite figured out how to sell fibre broadband solutions to customers.
|Country||Homes Passed (FTTH/B)||Take-up||Total Subscribers|
The ‘Homes Passed’ column is the percentage of households within that country who are able to subscribe to fibre broadband. The ‘Take-up’ column shows how many who are able to purchase fibre actually do. The final column is the percentage of households across the country who have fibre connectivity. The remainder will either be on copper products or perhaps a FWA solution.
What is worth noting is that while it would be unfair to assume a 100% ‘Take-up’ rate, the fact that the ratios are very slow demonstrate there is perhaps not as much demand as some would assume. This could be explained by three points:
- Fibre connectivity is being priced too high
- There are not enough usecases/applications to justify upgrading to fibre
- Misleading advertising is breaking trust and dampening demand
There will of course be other factors in-play impacting the adopting of fibre broadband services, but these are the three which we feel as the most relevant for the moment.
As mentioned above, immediate demand is not a necessity for fibre services, as there is plenty of time to demonstrate ROI. Adtran Chief Technology Officer Ronan Kelly highlighted to Telecoms.com that fibre infrastructure has a guaranteed product lifecycle of at least 40 years, though we do not exactly know how long it actually is. The first deployments have not gotten to this point yet, so it might well be longer depending on degradation.
Another point which Kelly made was the dangers of comparing nations without taking into account the differences and nuances. For example, smaller and less geographical diverse countries will be easier to deploy fibre connectivity, while nations like Spain have a higher percentage of citizens living in multi-dwelling units (MDUs), again making the task of deploying fibre infrastructure to higher percentage of the population simpler.
Overall, the trends are heading in the right direction. Government policy and political rhetoric are adding momentum to the fibre rollout movement, while investors are mobilising behind a wide range of telcos to add more cash. Consumer demand for fibre services will be a contributing factor, but the demand creating by 5G backhaul also makes fibre investments more attractive nowadays.
Trends are coming together very nicely, and now the telcos just need to figure out how to sell these fibre services properly.
As mentioned before, due to the lifetime of fibre-optic products, the pressure to upgrade customers from copper to fibre is lessened, but considering the financial strain some of Europe’s telcos are facing, increased ARPU and ROI for fibre deployments would certainly be a requirement.