Ofcom makes switching mobile provider easier, Three still moans

There’s no Christmas slowdown for UK telecoms regulator Ofcom as it announces another initiative, this time to facilitate switching between mobile providers.

Attempting to move from one provider to another in the UK has long been an odious business. Call centers that usually take hours to respond to calls miraculously find ‘customer care’ agents immediately when you call the special ‘I’m thinking of leaving’ line.

These specialists are armed with an arsenal of weapons, techniques and strategies all designed to prevent you leaving. Sometimes these are benign, such as offering special deals, but if they fail there appear to be a range of obstacles, penalties and implied threats available to inflict on the hapless subscriber, all designed to make the process of leaving so painful that they’re likely to give up.

This has, of course, been the case for decades, but Ofcom has finally got around to doing something about it. According to the new rules imposed upon UK mobile operators, which they have 18 months to implement, punters can now simply ask for a code – via a text, call or website – and their incumbent provider has to deliver it within 24 hour, no questions asked.

Yes, we know that’s a tricky concept to get your head around. Luckily Ofcom has done a little diagram to break it down for you.

Ofcom switching

“Too many people are put off by the hassle of switching mobile provider. Our changes will make it quicker and easier for mobile phone users to get a better deal,” said Lindsey Fussell, Ofcom’s Consumer Group Director. “Customers will control how much contact they have with their current mobile provider, preventing companies from delaying and frustrating the switching process.”

The biggest beneficiary of this is likely to be Three, the smallest of the major UK MNOs. Three has issued a statement grudgingly applauding the move, but still moaning that it didn’t go further.

“For more than a decade Three has been encouraging Ofcom to do more to ensure that consumers can easily switch mobile phone provider and get the best deal,” said a Three spokesperson. “While we are pleased that there is now a simpler process, we believe that Ofcom’s decision not to prevent ‘last ditch’ deals means that the UK still lags behind its international peers in terms of consumer rights.”

Three seems to be saying Ofcom should have forced providers to make no other contact with their customer once the code request was received. It’s easy to see why that would serve its own interests but not how this serves the customer. Threatening to leave is one of the best ways to get a better deal from your incumbent provider and objecting to that process does not reflect well on Three. What’s not to like about being offered a discount?

USwitch, a price comparison site that makes money from people using its platform to switch providers, is also pleased but still wants more. “It is encouraging to see Ofcom taking steps to make it easier for customers to take their mobile number between mobile providers,” said Richard Neudegg of uSwitch.

“Our own research from earlier this year found that while one in five thought text-to-switch would make them more likely to switch provider, more than double would have been encouraged to change under a gaining-provider led process, the alternative system that Ofcom decided against. While it’s disappointing Ofcom did not go further, this is still an improvement that will make it easier for more customers to get a better deal.”

The gaining-provider led process once more silences the incumbent provider by handing control of the switching process to the new one. Again, while it’s easy to see why this would be in uSwitch’s interest as it would probably increase the volume of switching, it’s less clear how this would benefit the punter.

UK Indoor mobile reception still a bit rubbish – uSwitch.com

Price comparison site uSwitch surveyed around 2,000 UK mobile users to ask about their mobile phone experiences.

The headline stat is that 29% of them said they have poor or no indoor reception at home. As you can see from the first table below this phenomenon is worst in the country and best in the suburbs. It’s also worth noting that every type of location said their reception is less rubbish than it was a year ago.

uswitch uk indoor coverage 1

Ernest Doku, of uSwitch said a bunch of stuff. “When it comes to indoor mobile coverage, we’ve seen a slight improvement over the last year,” he said. “This is good news for the areas that have noticed a significantly lower incidence of intermittent or poor mobile reception in their own homes – notably mobile users in inner cities and suburban neighborhoods – but it’ll be of little consequence to those that are still suffering.

“The urban vs rural disparity is especially concerning. Mobile users living in the countryside are left feeling failed by providers that are yet to effectively extend their coverage outside of built-up areas. This discrepancy is starkly illustrated by this research which has seen negligible improvements made to indoor mobile service in rural areas over the last year. Whilst progress should be applauded and this prioritised focus on more densely populated areas is great for many consumers, it is of little consolation for those still living in mobile not-spots.”

There was lots more but that was mostly the inevitable calls for people to shop around. Isn’t it funny how often research commissioned by price comparison sites concludes that people need to compare prices? But having an ulterior motive doesn’t necessarily discredit the data. The next table below shows there’s not a lot of difference in indoor reception between the big UK operators. Then there’s a somewhat confusing one that seems to imply over half of people experience moody calls at home 19% of the time.

uswitch uk indoor coverage 2

uswitch uk indoor coverage 3